FirmAdapt

Filling Insurance Applications From the Client Record Instead of Retyping Them

Commercial submissions mean typing the same client details into ACORD forms, carrier supplementals and cover letters. How to make the client record the source and let the forms fill themselves.

A commercial account manager at a small independent agency is preparing a renewal submission for a landscaping contractor. She fills in the ACORD 125 commercial application, the 126 general liability section, the 127 business auto section and the 130 workers' compensation application. Then she fills in two carriers' supplemental questionnaires, each asking for much the same information in a different layout. The vehicle schedule comes from a spreadsheet the client emailed last year, the payroll figures from an email thread, and the description of operations from last year's submission, lightly edited. The whole package takes most of a day, and next year she'll do it again.

Agencies run on accurate applications, and the people preparing them are skilled. Most of their time on a submission, though, goes into moving information that already exists from one place to another. That's slow, it introduces errors that can matter a great deal when a claim comes in, and it's the kind of work that can be largely automated once the client record is trustworthy.

This article covers what to clean up in your agency management system first, and what an automated submission flow does with ACORD forms, carrier supplementals and client confirmations.

What retyping costs an agency

Time is the visible cost: hours per commercial submission, multiplied across every new account and renewal. In a small agency, that time comes from the same people who should be reviewing coverage, marketing accounts and talking to clients.

Errors are the more serious cost. A wrong class code, an outdated vehicle schedule or a payroll figure from the wrong year can lead to mispriced policies, audit surprises or, in the worst case, coverage disputes. Applications are the insured's representations to the carrier, so accuracy matters for the client as much as for the agency's errors and omissions exposure.

Speed suffers too. Submissions that take a day to prepare go to market later, which leaves less time to negotiate before the renewal date.

Fix the client record first

Make the agency management system the source of truth

Many agency management systems, such as Applied Epic, AMS360, HawkSoft and EZLynx, can already fill standard ACORD forms from the client record. That only helps if the record is complete and current. Check what's stored in the system and what lives in spreadsheets, emails and old submissions, and move the important data into the record.

Keep schedules in the system

Vehicle schedules, driver lists, locations, equipment and payroll by class code are the data most often kept outside the system and most often out of date. Store them in the client record, with a date showing when each was last confirmed by the client.

Write standard descriptions

A clear, accurate description of each client's operations should live on the record and be reviewed annually, instead of being rewritten or copied from an old submission each time.

Standardize what each submission needs

For each line of business and each carrier you place with regularly, list the forms and supplementals required, the loss runs needed and any other attachments. A checklist per submission type makes it obvious what's missing.

Build in client confirmation

Decide how the client confirms the information before it goes to carriers: what they review, how they sign, and how changes they report get written back to the record.

What the automated submission flow does

  1. Starts from the record. The account manager opens a submission for a client and line of business. The system pulls the client record, schedules, current policy details and the checklist for that submission type.
  2. Fills the standard forms. ACORD forms are filled from the record, using the form versions available through your licensed sources.
  3. Fills carrier supplementals. For each carrier's supplemental application, an AI model reads the questions, maps each one to the data already held, and fills what it can. Questions it can't answer from the record, especially underwriting questions about operations or losses, are left blank and listed.
  4. Asks the client the open questions. The client gets a secure link with a short list of what needs confirming or answering: updated payroll, vehicle changes, new locations, the remaining supplemental questions. Their answers update the record.
  5. Requests loss runs. Where loss runs are needed from a prior carrier, the request goes out automatically with the client's authorization, and the system tracks it until it arrives.
  6. Drafts the narrative. A draft description of operations and a cover letter to the underwriter are prepared from the record and the account manager's notes.
  7. Prepares a review packet. The account manager sees every form, with changes from last year highlighted, unanswered questions listed, and inconsistencies flagged, such as a vehicle count that doesn't match the schedule.
  8. Collects signatures and sends. After review, applications that need the insured's signature go for e-signature, and the completed submission goes to carriers by email or portal, logged against the client in the agency management system.

Our one-click paperwork system handles this kind of form filling, and the insurance page shows how it connects with lead follow-up, renewal tracking and client updates.

Where AI fits and where it shouldn't

The standard ACORD fields are best filled by straightforward data mapping, which agency systems already do. AI models add value on the parts that don't map neatly: reading supplemental applications that vary by carrier, matching questions to data held under different names, comparing this year's information with last year's, and drafting narratives. Every one of those outputs gets reviewed.

AI should never answer underwriting questions on the client's behalf. Questions about prior losses, operations, safety programs or anything the insured is representing need the client's own answer. A wrong answer filled in by software is still a misrepresentation on the application.

A worked example

Take the landscaping contractor's renewal from the opening. Before the next renewal season, the agency moves the vehicle schedule, driver list and payroll by class code from spreadsheets into the client record, each with a last-confirmed date, and rewrites the description of operations as a standard paragraph on the record. When the account manager opens the renewal submission, the ACORD forms fill from the record, and both carriers' supplementals are filled where the questions map to known data. Say eleven supplemental questions can't be answered from the record, including two about subcontracted tree work. Those go to the client through a secure link, alongside a request to confirm payroll and the vehicle list. The client adds a new truck and answers the questions from his phone. The account manager's review packet shows the new vehicle, the payroll change from last year and the client's answers, and the submission goes to market the same week.

What to watch out for

  • Client sign-off. The insured must review and confirm the information. Make the review easy and specific, highlighting what changed, so they actually read it.
  • Sensitive data. Applications contain tax identification numbers, driver's license numbers, dates of birth and sometimes Social Security numbers for sole proprietors. Use secure links, limit access, and know where every system in the chain stores data.
  • Form licensing. ACORD forms are licensed. Use them through the sources your agency is licensed for, typically your agency management system.
  • Stale records. Automation makes it faster to reuse last year's data, which is a risk if nobody confirms it. Show the date each schedule was last confirmed, and require confirmation before submission.
  • Carrier portals. Some carriers require submissions through their own portals. Check each portal's terms before automating anything that interacts with it.

How to tell whether it's working

Time submissions end to end before and after, and count how many fields the account manager had to enter or correct by hand. Track how long clients take to confirm their information, and how often carriers come back with questions about missing or inconsistent data. Over a renewal cycle, also track how far ahead of expiration submissions reach the market, since earlier submissions give more room to negotiate. Errors caught in the review packet are worth logging as well, because they show where the client record still needs work.

Where to start this week

Time one commercial submission from start to finish and note where every piece of information came from: the agency system, a spreadsheet, an email, last year's file or the client. That list shows exactly which data needs to move into the client record. Then pick your twenty largest commercial accounts and make sure their schedules and operations descriptions are current in the system before their next renewal.

With clean records, the standard forms largely fill themselves, and automating the supplementals, client confirmations and review packet turns a day of retyping into a review the account manager can complete in a fraction of the time.

If you'd like a quick read on where submission work sits among the other jobs worth automating at your agency, run the free PATH report. To talk through your current process, book a call.

InsuranceAutomationDocument automationAcord forms

Enjoyed this? Get the next one by email

Practical writing on AI in business, from the team that builds and runs it.

Free. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy policy

See where AI fits in your business

Enter your website for a free PATH report. First findings in about a minute.